FEATURES & NEWS
Print this article
Handling Hard Assets
By Drew Voros | 02 May, 2012

[This article previously appeared on HardAssetsInvestor.com and is reproduced with their permission]

When it comes to commodity indices, the S&P GSCI is often considered the benchmark for the sector. Incorporating all commodity sectors and using a production weighting methodology, the index has hundreds of billions of investment dollars tracking it as well as other commodity indices in the company’s index arsenal. Hard Assets Investor’s managing editor Drew Voros recently spoke with Jodie Gunzberg, director of S&P’s commodity indices. Gunzberg talked about the company’s flagship commodity index and how it offers diversification and inflation protection; the importance of energy in an index; and active versus passive management when it comes to commodity investing.

Drew Voros: Anything out there in the commodities world that has surprised you so far in 2012?

Jodie Gunzberg: Well I don’t think too much about what is interesting about commodities until there’s a surprise, and it’s usually an upside surprise because there are supply shocks; so things like the EU and US sanctions on Iran, the Sudan/South Sudan political pressures, what’s going on in Yemen. All of that pressures supply, which in turn actually supports the price.

An example for the other side—a demand shock—would be something like a mad cow scare that would send the prices of meat down. Demand shocks happen a lot less frequently than supply shocks. That’s one of the characteristics of commodities.

DV: Your commodity index, the S&P GSCI, is well known to most commodity investors. What are some of the other indices in the S&P family that commodity investors should be aware of?

Gunzberg: We actually have quite a number of commodity indices at S&P and, of course, the S&P GSCI is our flagship index. Beyond that, we have a family of modified-weight indices. The S&P GSCI Light Energy index is one of the more popular ones, along with the S&P GSCI Equal Weight Select. Those types of indices are for investors who are looking for a commodity exposure with potentially less energy.

We also have modified-roll indices. The S&P GSCI sits in the front-month contract and these modified-roll indices fit in different spots. So we have a multiple-contract index—the S&P GSCI Multiple Contract—which we recently launched this year that sits in the first, second and third month forward. We’ve got forward indices such as S&P GSCI 3-Month Forward that are one, two, three, four or five months forward. We’ve got an enhanced index—the S&P GSCI Enhanced Index—which has been around for quite a while, and was launched about the same time as the S&P GSCI, which modifies the roll of the eight hardest-to-store commodities. And why that’s important is that those hardest-to-store commodities are the commodities that have the biggest costs from rolling. They have the most severe curves when in contango.

We also have a newer launch that’s been really popular—the S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll index —and that changes the roll on all 24 commodities.

DV: And that’s designed to avoid contango?

Gunzberg: It’s designed to minimise contango and also to reduce trading costs. It doesn’t go to the single contract that has the least contango every month, but it might go to the one that’s the second-least contango or third or fourth, depending on the cost-benefit analysis.

DV: Going back to S&P’s flagship commodity index, S&P GSCI, it’s up about 6 percent this year. What’s driving the index this year?

Gunzberg: Well, it’s mostly been the petroleum sector. Oil’s been up quite a bit. Brent crude oil, which is the second-heaviest constituent in the index, has been up more than 16 percent this year. That’s been a pretty big contributor. Even WTI crude is up at about 3.5 percent up, but it’s more than 30 percent of the index, so that’s quite a big contributor as well.

DV: Why does an index heavily weighted in energy make more sense than other commodity indices?

Gunzberg: The index is a production-weighted index. If you believe something like the S&P 500—which is a market-cap-weighted index—is a representative beta of the equity space, then the analogous situation in commodities is production weight. And the production weight yields a heavy energy because that’s the way that the world looks: there’s just more energy produced than there is corn or gold.

 



Comment Using:

blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Stay Connected!
ETF News Daily - Europe
ETF News Weekly - Europe
Sign up to receive ETF.com's newsletters.
 

Europe Blog

Tyler Mordy

The end of QE is the end of the world as we’ve known it since the crash, but it’s not the end of the world

... More

More Opinion







ADVERTISING